Is film photography a vice? I was reading an article on Luminous Landscape about slide film yesterday, and the author's conclusion got me thinking. He said he couldn't imagine going back to slide film, especially from a cost perspective. Certainly, film does have more recurring costs than digital. But film photography is something to be cherished and appreciated. Some might call it a vice. The key for any vice though, is moderation. So shoot that roll of film, knowing full well what it's costing you in money, and what you're gaining in enjoyment.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ef47/6ef47b21be8efe61a6e9757e6dfd832a839c46d4" alt="Mutianyu"
What does the Great Wall have to do with this message? Nothing, other than the fact that it's the exact opposite of moderation. But who cares? It is truly a wonder of the world, and well worth the long trip to get there. I was lucky enough to take my new Leica M6 and 35/2 Summicron along last month. In spite of the cold, the Leica never missed a beat. And the Tri-X flowed.
Perhaps a Leica is an example of moderation in itself. No frills, no excess, minimal design incarnate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dee/a0deec19df35713604be160541b07907c0b4a24c" alt="SFO to PEK"
Where does the 747 fall in the continuum of moderation?